“No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act” H.R. 3

Don’t our House of Representatives have critically important issues about the economy and deficit and education and national safety to work on? Why this? Why not assistance to working mothers for childcare? Plans to educate a new work force? They are getting paid WAY TOO MUCH to be spending so much time on an issue that hinders instead of helps the country move forward.

Take Action with NOW.

Beyond Extreme: Defeat the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act


H.R. 3, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, represents a grave threat to safe, legal and accessible abortion. In addition to restricting the use of private funds paying for private health insurance plans that cover abortion care, it would permanently write into law an extremist approach to banning federal funding for abortion. Adding dangerous insult to injury, H.R. 3 would narrow rape and incest exceptions.


The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act would codify a collection of federal abortion funding restrictions referred to as the Hyde Amendment. Under the Hyde Amendment, federal funding for abortion care is segregated from all other forms of health care and severely restricted. This grave injustice puts women’s health and lives at risk and disproportionately harms women of color. Currently, these restrictions must be re-approved annually through the appropriations process. But H.R. 3 would establish Hyde as the law of the land. While groups like NOW campaign to repeal Hyde, leave it to the conservatives to try to make it permanent.

The No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act would also restrict coverage of abortion care more radically than the new health insurance reform law does. If H.R. 3 passes, employers would incur tax penalties for providing health insurance that offers abortion coverage. In addition, individuals would incur tax penalties for carrying private insurance that includes abortion coverage.

Cruelly, H.R. 3 narrows rape exceptions currently present in the Hyde Amendment to only “forcible” rapes. Does the radical right believe “forcible” rape includes date rape, rape occurring as a result of being drugged by a perpetrator, while a woman is intoxicated or asleep, after consent has been withdrawn or while a woman does her best not to get further injured or killed? No, they don’t — and now they want to further attack women who have been sexually assaulted.

Update: Thanks to feminist outrage, sponsors of this legislation removed the word “forcible” from the rape exception. While we congratulate our activists for winning this initial victory, the remaining bill continues to pose an unacceptable threat to women’s ability to access abortion care and must be defeated.

Write your Representative!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: